Seun Ayilara

If your child comes back from school and says to you that his/her lesson teacher and class teacher are saying different things on the same subject even though they are using the same textbook. What would your reasons be? Even though they are not using the same book but their concept about a subject does not change the fact is, it should be accurately the same, the only thing that is permitted to differ is just the wording and not the ideology or the central message. How come you are now comfortable listening to charlatans with 2 contradictory opinions on a subject matter even though they claim they are teaching from the same textbook? How come you are not interested in doing your research to figure out what exactly the truth is for yourself? Could it be you are not interested in the truth but just that you can not allow your money to go to waste in the case of your child?  Because you can't tell me you are still comfortable sitting and watching these charlatans spat their empty spi

Think! learn to get your original thought on every matter. The maker or the originator of man did not just put the capacity to think for accessories' sake. It was meant for functionality's sake so use it, begin to think let your thinking faculty come alive  Research has shown that if you take the thinking faculty off any man, he then ceased to be a human so in order not to function like anything other than human then think!  Use it! It's for your use.

  It was Henry Ford that said that whether you think you can or you cannot you are right. The person should be afraid of the most if at all you should be afraid of any person is yourself. Why? Because yourself has the capacity to believe whatever would make or mar you.  Some guys were promised a better place in the Bible they got to the shores of the better place and in the process of seeking out what was in that better place, they sent out some guys to carry out a survey and those guys came with these reports:  They said that they saw themselves as grasshoppers to the giants living in that place. That the inhabitants were like Giants in their eyes was true but, they also made another statement; they said that the inhabitants of the land which they considered to be giants also saw them as grasshoppers. That was false because they did not interrogate those inhabitants they didn't ask the giant whether that was how they also perceived them to be grasshoppers.  But they believed it an